fig.
8
fig.
9
The
five pins, with a diameter of 1.3 mm, positioned approximately 3 mm from one another,
are welded together by two crossbars with a diameter of 1.6 mm each; the prosthetic
teeth are positioned above the implant.

fig.
10
Owing
to the geometric complexity of this type of implant and the large number of elements
required to reproduce it (31,540), it was necessary to simplify the most irregular
areas of the hemimandible model used to study the other types of implant as follows:
-
The superior part of the mandible is squared (fig. 11);
-
the volume of cortical corresponding to the chin bone was not included in the
study.

fig.
11
In
addition, the shape of the post teeth and the prosthetic teeth is similar but
not identical to that in the hemimandible model used to study other types of implant.
Owing to these differences in geometry and hence discretisation, when comparing
the results with other types of implant, it was more appropriate to make a qualitative
and comparative analysis, rather than a punctual and quantitative one.